David, I read your piece here
Women Are Overtaking Men in the US - Sphere News
and I must say, all your cliché misandric (man-hating) assumptions are false and covering up for your preference of women just because they're women. The facts of the case of the legal, political, economic relationship between men and women is one of the most vastly misunderstood topics in the West due to hyperfeminist Establishment propaganda. The tone of your man-hating, truly misandric diatribe almost seems like you'd want to get rid of men all together. A truly more self-hating man I have never seen. Such humiliation tactics against men indeed serve to prolong the legal, political, and cultural bias against men.
Double the number of single women are now purchasing homes in America than there are single men.
this is irrelevent. Not only were many of these homes funded by government, ie freddie and fannie, which are funded by taxes, which surprise, men pay most of. But these 'single' women are STILL getting 'alimony' payments like a 2nd income parasitized from their ex-husbands who still have to toil and want no such life-sucking exploitations on them. This is all legally enforced and decided by judges and courts.
The New Hampshire State Legislature is now made up of a majority of women, a first for a legislative body in the U.S., and the number of women in government continues to edge up nationwide.
this isn't even a good thing because it's the GOVERNMENT in the end anyway!! New Hampshire hasn't gotten any better because women are the majority, government continues to become more corrupt, and 'more women' hasn't done anything. Besides, men make more libertarian political arguments whereas women would favour more statism and 'collective' marxist type government. Capitalism is better for men and women, marxism is bad for both.
Women now account for 30 percent of math Ph.D.s, up from just 5 percent in the 1960s.
yet men still continue to innovate and discover more in this area.
On average, women read nine books every year. Men only read four, and women account for 80 percent of the U.S. fiction market.
80% of the FICTION market, doesn't that tell you something about the sex differences between men and women? Jeez, what is the stat on the non-fiction market why don't they have that?
The World Bank recently estimated that the global earning power of women will reach an estimated $18 trillion by the year 2014, up $5 trillion today.
and yet....YET....men will STILL be expected to pay for dinner, dates, movies, wining and dining, getting rich and spending thousands, sometimes millions on women. Are more women now also buying men dinner, movies, vacations, etc.. with this 'earning power'? And how come ex-wives STILL get coercive alimony inflicted on men by courts?? cant they pay their own way?? And how come men are thrown in jail for getting unemployed and unable to pay child support, but women dont have to pay child support if they have custody? Men are still getting screwed by the government and other people because they're men. Is this what 'overtaking' means? Cheating your way through, not actually competing like the boys?
"Women really have become the dominant gender,"
and of course with a blunt statement like this is designed to ignore all the vast injustices, economic and legal double standards that exist against men. And why do we need all these affirmative action, quotas, 'positive discrimination' for women programs if they're becoming so 'dominant' then?? why all this discrimination AGAINST men, limiting men's competition by law??? This proves that this 'dominance' is a charade. Not competition dominance, actually working for it dominance, but legal dominance.
with all this apparent 'dominant gender' they are now, why are UK politicians STILL wanting to legally enforce boards made up of at least half of women? Shouldn't they be able to get there on their own??? why do we need all these legal discriminations enforced by courts and police against men simply for being men??? why aren't we allowing women to freely compete without any training wheels???
I'll tell you why, because then we would realize that they AREN'T actually the 'dominant' gender, they just make you believe the illusion of it by their sexual attractiveness. Men are still making more money, working longer hours, and spending it MORE on their families and women than even themselves
"What concerns me is that guys are rapidly falling behind. Women are becoming better educated than men, earning more than men, and, generally speaking, not needing men at all. Meanwhile, as a group, men are losing their way."
having more college degrees is NOT 'better educated.' For the most part, publically funded colleges and universities will usually favour the state and the present government on its policies, it has to for having it as its paymaster. Like I said, libertarianism is mainly dominated by men. Men are better aware of political events and have more interest in it than women. if women are becoming better educated than men, why do half or most of them still vote for bush and obama? or the other mediocre and puppet candidates? The libertarian vote is mostly men.
and, women ARE NOT earning more than men. This is a lie. Men are still earning more on average and still work longer hours. Women may make up 51% of the workforce but this DOESN'T MEAN that they're working longer hours! Infact they work more part-time and less hours.
how can you NOT need men? You need families don't you? And fathers and mothers? oh wait, not according to feminism. You don't need fathers, only need their paychecks.
And if women don't 'need' men, then why do they STILL EXPECT US to wine and dine, and buy things for them in order to even have the chance to get sex or be together????? Whhyy or whyy, can't they pay their own way or even wine and dine us at times???? And why do they expect us to buy diamonds for them and propose on our knee? why does the man always buy the ring???? Can't they buy their own diamonds or buy us diamonds at times????
and if they don't 'need' men, then why are men STILL BEING forced to pay alimony payments, an extortion tax placed on the man by the law, for the woman to parasitize?????
It seems like, society expects men to spend money on women, but doesn't have such a sentiment the other way. If women really are 'dominant' now and 'don't need men' at all, then perhaps they can stop expecting men to buy them things and wine and dine them all the time, buy them a ring for marriage, alimony after divorce, etc etc...
and if they don't need men, then why do men STILL PAY MORE taxes which goes to everyone and also in some cases specifically for women, ie women only government programs??? Is this dominance? Having men paying for it??
In fact, a gender education gap, in which women are far outpacing men in terms of educational achievement, has been quietly growing in America over the past few decades. In 2009, for instance, women will earn more degrees in higher education than men in every possible category, from associate level to Ph.D.s, according to the U.S. Department of Education. When it comes to master's-level education, for instance, U.S. women earn 159 degrees for every 100 awarded to men
but this doesn't automatically entail achieving more or working longer hours in the future
"The big reason for the disparity is that women are going back to finish college or get new degrees and training," said Heather Boushey, senior economist at the Center for American Progress and one of the co-authors of The Shriver Report, which considers the implications of shifting gender roles.
i wonder how much of these tuitions is being paid by their spouses?
"But then they get out into the workplace and they find that they still make just 77 cents on the dollar compared with men."
this is a bald faced LIE. Women earn less than men because they choose to work shorter hours and have more time off at home, including for children. They also tend to work in less lucrative fields.
Garcia bemoaned what he sees as a "fragmentation of male identity," in which husbands are asked to take on unaccustomed familial roles such as child care and housework, while wives bring in the bigger paychecks.
this is silly. Most 'work' is mundane and unmotivating anyway. If I have to choose between taking on a mundane job or being at home with my kids I'd choose the second. There's no 'fragmentation' of male identity, that's perhaps what YOU'D like to see, it gives you a kick to humiliate men and shame them for your own perversity. The only 'fragmentation' of male identity there is is the legal, political, marital, economic discrimination against men.
Boushey, on the other hand, thinks that now that both men and women are starting to share in the dual burdens of work and home responsibilities, we're more likely to find solutions that benefit both genders.
"There was a division of labor, right or wrong, that men understood," Garcia said. "Now, the trade-offs are murky, and women often get stuck doing both jobs--taking care of kids and playing the primary breadwinner."
that's because many women don't want the father to be the primary care taker, they believe it infringes on their 'domain'. It is my take that more men are willing to accept being the primary care taker than the bread winner (not a bad thing) but many women would still find something disagreeable in that. In fact one recent academic study still showed that women prefer spouses who make more money than them!!!
so you see david, misandry (the hatred and shaming of men for the fun of it, while disregarding the governmental, marital, cultural discrimination) will get us nowhere to end the war of the sexes. Feminism started a sex war when it declared that men were the sole problem. In light of these governmental discriminations that privilege women over men, and make them obligated to support them even when they 'don't need men' is an absurd paradox. Only the end of false 'chivalry' will make men and women political equals.
|
27th-December-2009
