It's a shame to say it, but this is a awesome post... if only it could belong in the sci-fi section.
Women suffocating men.
In today’s world a man (or boy) has no space. Everywhere he looks it seems he is
surrounded by the loud clamouring of women. These days there is an additional penalty for committing the crime of being male. There is no escape; there is no room to breath. From the incessant nattering, there is no escape. The prattling of the female has no ‘off Control.’
Television is drowning in programs and adverts aimed at women. The news is dominated by women. It is read by women, interviewing other women. Apparently there is no such thing as a ‘spokesman’ anymore, only ‘spokeswomen,’ even in the Armed Services. A short while ago the news was that service personnel, serving in dangerous areas were to receive a bonus payment, (the information was wrong as it transpired) but they needed to get the views of a soldier serving on the front line in Iraq. It seems there are no male soldiers serving on the front line because…you guessed it……they interviewed a female soldier. There is no escape.
Newspapers are covered with the inane ramblings of women who cannot resist having a dig at men or an excuse for a woman, no matter what the subject. Even when the writer is male, he too has to write from a woman’s perspective, and he too – as if by some unwritten law- must include a dig at men or an excuse for a woman.
When writing on matters relating to men, such as prostrate cancer, the focus of the article is on the impact it has on the women in the lives of these men. It’s as if we have no feeling of pain, humiliation, embarrassment or emotion of any sort. We are just there.
Special allowances and services are provided for women because, we are told, everything is so much worse for a woman, even baldness it seems! Yet, without apparent contradiction a woman can write an article celebrating men’s suicide rates, deaths from cancers and shorter life span, as a sign of women’s superiority. There is no sense of scandal, or demand for an investigation, as a man would if the roles were reversed, just a self satisfied smugness. There is no escape.
The superior deity swaggers into your face, full of self delusion. Always overrating herself, always thinking she is better than she is, but never challenged.
Today, the ‘Boy Scouts’ would have celebrated 100 years, but they had to celebrate it as the ‘Scouts.’ There was a time when they had their own space, away from the matriarchy, to learn new skills, to be adventurous, to be…..to be a boy. Not anymore, girls had to be admitted and if you look at the web sites there seems to be more girls than boys. Of course, boys are not allowed to join the ‘Girl Guides.’ There is no escape.
When a woman moves in with a man all his treasured possessions, dating back to his boyhood are transported to the basement/attic, out of sight, out of mind and out of existence. He has no past, not present and no future………only hers. There is no escape.
Even in the sports locker room there is no escape. Female sports journalist can barge their way in, it would hold back their careers otherwise. Of course the reverse is not true. Female prison guards can search male prisoners, but not the reverse. She can monitor him, on CCTV while he completes his bodily functions. It would hold back her career otherwise, and if she feels traumatised by such a distasteful duty, that she loudly complained to have, she can sue for millions. There is no escape.
The noise of their complaints increases to a deafening crescendo –
Men cause all the wars.
Men are jerks.
Men are animals.
Men are slobs.
Men are babies.
Men don’t go to the doctors because they are afraid. Men are wimps, the fuss they make over a little cold.
Men do not share the housework.
He does not meet my sexual needs.
He does not make me happy.
He does not provide as I expected.
He leaves the toilet seat up. Why can’t men sit when they go to the toilet?
Why can’t men be more like women?
Why can’t men express their feelings like us?
………..Where are all the real men gone?
The water is contaminated with oestrogen from the ‘pill.’ We are drowning in a sea of oestrogen. There is no escape.
I must have dropped off for a minute. I had this nightmare……….I was drowning in………
Am I being paranoid or does anyone else have this feeling?
Last edited by pjanus; 1st-August-2007 at 11:44 PM.
It's a shame to say it, but this is a awesome post... if only it could belong in the sci-fi section.
--Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.--
Antimisandry now offers it's members personal sub-forums
(click here to register yours)
►A Decade of Investment in YOUR Future. ►AntiMisandry.com
It's called the awakening, the realization that women generally suck...
A sad and sorry realisation that not only are they totally self-focussed but they also really do not give a bugger about anyone else but themselves...
You have completed your first step...
Next and this is harder.. treat them like they treat you, with total disdain...
Another one he didn't mention was Boys Town, originally a refuge for orphans and troubled youth in Nebraska. Fr Flanagan became world famous for his efforts, and two Hollywood movies were produced about it. Now it's become, you guessed it, Boys and Girls Town (or something). No escape.
btw the pop classic He Ain't Heavy, He's My Brother was apparently inspired by a statue from Boys Town, a boy carrying a younger lad on his shoulders. I love that song.
Feminism = Fear + Flattery
Well, I guess you are never too old for an awakening.
I have seen and experienced many things in my life and posted on another thread a video of circumcision. I could not watch the full video yet, Annette could. Perhaps because of my experience I cannot bear to hear the screams of a baby. The chickens come home to roost?
On the thread, referred to, two women debate the pros and cons of male genital mutilation. Meanwhile Annette has found the answer to our problems. She proposes that we drink of the oestrogen contaminated waters and become gay.
Is being gay the answer?
An unthinkable question for most men, I realize....which is why I asked it, so you guys don't have to
There are men who really don't like women, and don't want to need women. So the way I see it, the solution is to be gay. I realize the cause of homosexuality is disputable (birth or choice, who knows for sure)...but if it IS possible to choose to be gay, wouldn't that route make life easier as far as women go?
I was watching some old episodes of SIX FEET UNDER last night, and thought about this (due to the male gay couple in the show.) They can fully avoid all women if they choose to, just because they're gay.
No Annette, we just need some space. We need women to stop complaining, defining and manipulating men to suit their needs.
There is no escape.....I'm drowning in........
Notwithstanding religious beliefs I think that if you, as a male, went onto a female forum and started pontificating on the virtues of FGM, you wouldn't last very long.
For the first 8 years of our marriage, my husband was not circumcised (I never told my parents this, loL!) His was only the 2nd uncut penis I'd ever seen (in total, I've only seen 2 in my life, the other being a guy in Europe I'd met the year before.)
My husband was born into a conservative Christian (Baptist) home, and when we met, he was a nominal Christian and I was a nominal Jew.
After a few years, he began a religious journey into the Bible that eventually led him to want to convert to Orthodox Judaism. He sort of took me along for the 'ride', which is how I returned to the religious Jewish lifestyle myself.
Anyway, he was circumcised as part of the conversion, and he is in the (I assume) unusual situation of knowing what it is like both uncut and then cut. He tells me that he enjoys sex more circumcised, because (his words), "I last longer". I'd have to agree that he does "last longer" now (or is that too much information again?)
Its interesting how he came to be uncut from birth, even though he's American. He was born on a US Air Force base in France in the 1950s, and the French pediatrician convinced his mother not to circumcised him, even though his father was circumcised. So, she left it alone. He said he was teased horribly at school in gym class by the other boys when they got back to the States.
I don't know about you, but I have an aversion to men being discussed, by women, on the level of animals.
I like women. I always have. I first fell in love when I was five, with a six year old girl. Started young!
But there is too much of a good thing.
The point pjanus makes is valid. Young chaps today cannot grow as they are smothered by women, and men are vorboten. He has few masculine models allowed and he is imbued with the poisonous view of men that most women have.
Today's boys are like Parzival, but have no Knights to find, follow and learn from. Today's young men are full of 'women's ways' and our culture is rank with sour perfume. We have an entire generation of wounded.
My God, pjanus. That was powerful. And oh, so true. I've felt many times since I unplugged that the world is an insane asylum, and it's being run by the inmates. I can do nothing about it more than what I am doing. It's all any of us can do - point out the obvious, make sure people know that misandry ain't gonna fly, at least around us.
I'd like to publish it in my blog, if you'd let me. I am a woman, but I totally agree with you. It's ok if you don't want me to publish. I won't use your handle if you don't want me to.
I know you are a woman, I was one of the first to discover your blog and I visit it daily.
There is plenty of room in my world for beautiful women, and I am not speaking of the, shallow, aesthetically pleasing variety.
Please feel free to publish whatever you consider appropriate. Like your new avatar.
Apologies for resurrecting an old thread. I was just reading this article by
one of the many feminist writers at the guardian. The, boring, article asks
the question "is segregation the only the only answer to sexual harassment."
She is of course referring to the women only trains, beaches and gyms.
However, she quoted another feminist on the subject and it seems that 'men
are taking up too much space.' and we are judging their bodies while
flaunting our own? I suppose that is the other side of the coin the only
difference is that she gets to air her views in a national newspaper. Which
brings me to the feminists latest trick of complaining that women's voices are
Not all feminists are so sceptical though. American writer, Katha Pollitt, says she doesn't think that the rise of women-only spaces will excuse society from confronting harassment and violence. Instead, she believes they simply offer a small respite for women in a male-dominated world. "Obviously, there would never be enough women-only space to accommodate all women all the time - half the subway cars or half the hotels," says Pollitt. "Women-only space is just a little breathing place for a few women every now and then." Pollitt also notes hat women-only spaces aren't just about escaping harassment. "Men just take up too much space. They judge women's bodies. They flaunt their own. This is not going to change in our lifetime, or possibly ever."
The logical conclusion to the desire to shrink male space is something like concentration camps. Feminazi indeed.
Blessed are the cracked, for they let in the light. (Spike Milligan)
Yes, I was wondering what sort of confinement she had in mind. Although, this might not sit well with other feminists. They don't like men gathering on their own in case we are plotting something. That's why they have stormed all male places and leave us no space. They like to be in our face when it suits them.
Last edited by pjanus; 8th-August-2007 at 10:35 PM.
Great original post/thread pjanus.
Women, and more recently feminists, "inherently" seek to suffocate/micromanage every essence of our existence, our voice, and the space we 'dare' to inhabit (something noted by philosophers and writers over many millennia). Remember, feminism with all it's suffocating demands, is merely a socially/politically validated ideological exaggeration of something - women have always been. They mean to control the direction of our ideas and energies, into gynocentrically themed endeavours. Any other deviation is deemed as a failure on their part, in not manipulating it thus.
Even on a personal level, as a wife or girlfriend, most women will suffocate by way of nagging,manipulating,blackmailing, etc, until he submits to "her ways." That's why many women begrudge their men from having friends, as it meddles with her tyrannical influence/control over him. Besides, friends, especially single friends, are the mortal enemy of wives and girlfriends. For they bring news of freedom!!!!
This control can become so extreme (or is it deemed normal by virtue of the behaviour exhibited by so many women, it becomes common, thus normal?) a wife or girlfriend can actually become jealous over inanimate objects, such as cars, games consoles, motorbikes, computers, through to tv programmes. In fact anything that doesn't exclusively revolve around the sacred cow.
Just as the slave owners of yesterday curtailed and forbade the congregating of slaves, as collectively they might get uppity ideas of rights, freedom, and voicing ones righteous concerns. Todays morally vacuous, and supremacist-orientated women, alongside the femi-nazis aren't really any different given their "social license."
The wicked flee when none pursueth. Proverbs 28:1
'Rise like Lions after slumber In unvanquishable number - Shake your chains to earth like dew Which in sleep had fallen on you - Ye are many - they are few.'
Percy Bysshe Shelley
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. "
The internet has been a lifeboat for men's opposition to the floodings of feminism.