Jessica Valenti posted this yesterday:

Here are some of the comments:

Yes, we must include the menz - because thems is all rapists in hiding... [/sarcasm]

Violence against women "pandemic"?

I can only wonder who's opinion and "version" of "the facts" will be used for the
intended educationof men.

Will this be the same information that is used to educate judges behind closed doors in tropical retreats?
Will this be the same "data" that is the foundation of The Duluth Model?

I'm already seeing reference to the implication of morning-after regret, and virginity rebate, aren't from teenage/early twenties girls freely "exploring and engaging" in all sorts of sexual intercourse after they've been "exploring and engaging" in alcohol/drugs, they are to be considered drugged and/or raped, AGAINST THEIR WILL, in "many" cases.
Despite what they might otherwise be forced to testify in a court of law, and be
subject to penalties for attempted extortion, contempt, liable, and slander. (Yeah, yeah, I know, demonstrably NOT a historically realistic issue for women in "many" cases.)


OK, but without emancipation from "special protections" (tuition/insurance up to 25 years old is deemed "child" support?), these folk who are unable to tend to their own affairs will be denied access to ETOH, and public ballots on important issues, right?

Where does the term Sophomoric come from?
What does it mean?
At what point is someone to be simply ignored, and declared "unfit to manage their own affairs, and a diminished capacity ward of "The State", after consistently demonstrable failure to launch?

I would be livid had I seen one of these things in a men's bathroom. This is no less bigoted than seeing a "colored only" sign on a bathroom door or above a drinking fountain.

These people only use the true tragedy of rape as an excuse to vent their vitriolic hatred towards men instead of seeing the perpetrators as simply individuals who are bad regardless of their gender. Also, they seek to negate the fact that both genders are equally predisposed to all kinds of violent acts which include killing children and abusing fellow adults.

Men need to voice their offence at such things but we don't we just seem to take it. I, for one, will not.

John, you gotta remember - even raising your voice, a glare, a huff, a thought - it's ALL violence (when done by men).

Yea, apperantly....

hmmmmmmmm, Im considering joining the discussion and discussing Texas' new campus law

they still havent posted my comment

They will never post your comment.

why?
all I said was this
"if women's groups on campus really gave a damn about rape prevention, they would lobby their state to enact common sense self defense laws on campus like the great state of Texas did this year"
whats wrong with that

There is nothing wrong withat at all!

However, in the feminist mindset any atempt to educate women on how to take hold of any responsibility for protecting themselves, thus taking acountability, is considered victim blaming.

Don't be suprised if they post an article criticizing the Texas policy.

Obviously. Since they're designed to change the culture to want the government to wipe our asses.

maybe Im jumping the gun and they will let it be posted

heed the call! the clams of wrath with their self styled delusions of grandeur!
and they flatter themselves by think someone even wants to rape them.
as if some lonesome bastard in a hazmat suit with 5 pairs of gloves and a gasmask
would have the courage to even poke them in the side with a 10 foot pole!
demanding privacy by being an exhibitionist?
demanded their private society while planting a flag in my kingdom?
put on some more blush savage! your skull is showing!